I read Elliot Lusztig's angry demand to stop referring to people as "snowflakes," because the word is an insult to "college kids," an expression of "psychological abuse" created by "Trump supporters."
Lusztig linked to this recent article in the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/09/generation-snowflake-not-failing-us-self-harm-competition?CMP=share_btn_tw
I reply:
The term "snowflake" arose from a reference to everyone being treated as though they were unique individuals. The use of the term goes back at least to the 1970's -- and possibly earlier.
Elisabeth Kubler-Ross said in 1975, “Life is richest when we realize we are all snowflakes. Each of us is absolutely beautiful and unique. And we are here for a very short time."
Her saying circulated widely throughout the late 1970's and early 1980's. By 2005 the analogy to the supposed uniqueness of snowflakes was generally accepted. It appears in "help-section" books like "The Rejection Syndrome" (by Margaret Rogers van Coops).
Kenneth Martin's saying from 1992 gained currency over the past ten years: "We are all like snowflakes: delicate, vulnerable and no two alike...Put into the wrong environment, we melt away."
This subjection of the human will to the environment is what conservatives have rejected. The mere assertion that snowflake "is a term of psychological abuse" proves what the conservatives are saying: that the current generation views themselves largely as victims of their surroundings rather than as conquerors.